• 首页 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 投稿须知 | 出版道德规范 | 下载专区 | English
赵利安*,韩文强,王铁力.不同浓度粉煤灰浆体管内流动规律试验研究[J].实验力学,2019,34(3):517~525
不同浓度粉煤灰浆体管内流动规律试验研究
Experimental study on flow characteristics of fly ash slurry with different concentrations
投稿时间:2018-05-08  修订日期:2018-08-29
DOI:10.7520/1001-4888-18-101
中文关键词:  管道运输; 紊流水力坡度; 试验研究; 粉煤灰浆体; 过渡流速  屈服应力
英文关键词:pipeline transportation  turbulent hydraulic gradient  test study  fly ash slurry  transition velocity  yield stress
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51604144)资助
作者单位
赵利安* 辽宁工程技术大学 矿业学院, 辽宁 阜新 123000 
韩文强 辽宁工程技术大学 矿业学院, 辽宁 阜新 123000 
王铁力 中煤科工集团武汉设计研究院有限公司 管道输煤所 湖北 武汉 430064 
摘要点击次数: 505
全文下载次数: 125
中文摘要:
      粉煤灰浆体在矿山及地下工程中的使用越来越广泛,而其管道运输时的过渡流速、屈服应力衰减规律及紊流水力坡度方面的研究还略显不足,开展这方面的研究有重要的应用价值。为此本文进行了体积浓度为0.422、0.441、0.462和0.492的粉煤灰浆体在直径为0.0627m和0.0777m的水平管道中流动输送试验研究,通过试验数据分析,给出了浆体从层流到紊流的过渡流速值,结合前人研究成果,给出了浆体过渡流速计算公式。同时通过分析浆体切应力和切变率曲线,发现粉煤灰浆体流型为宾汉体。通过试验数据拟合法,给出了宾汉体屈服应力衰减系数与相对流速偏移量关系的表达式,由此给出了宾汉流体紊流水力坡度计算模型。对比结果表明,模型计算值与实测值最大偏差为9.42%。
英文摘要:
      Fly ash slurry is used more and more widely in mines and underground engineering, but the research on its transition velocity, yield stress attenuation law and turbulent hydraulic gradient in hydraulic transportation is still insufficient, so it is of important application value to carry out research on this area. In this paper, the flow transport experiments of volumetric fluids with a concentration of 0.422, 0.441, 0.462 and 0.492 in the horizontal pipelines with diameters of 0.0627m and 0.0777m were carried out. The experimental data were analyzed to give the slurry from laminar to turbulent flow. The transitional flow velocity value, combined with previous research results, gives the formula for calculating the slurry transition velocity. At the same time, by analyzing the slurry shear stress and shear rate curves, it turns out that the fly ash slurry flow pattern is Bingham flow. Through fitting the experimental data, the expression of the relationship between the yield stress attenuation coefficient and the relative flow velocity offset of Bingham body is given. The comparison results show that the maximum deviation between the calculated value and the measured value is 9.42%.
查看全文  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

版权所有:《实验力学》编辑部
您是本站第 65263860 位访问者,今日一共访问1310次,当前在线人数: 0
技术支持:本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计